Reading Database, Please Wait A Few Seconds...

National Missing Person Directory
Jana Carpenter-koklich Missing Person News and Details

home

Latest News

Missing People Search Engine

Last name:

First name:

City:

County:

State:

Erroneous Information ? The following Official Record of Jana Carpenter-koklich is being republished by missingin.org under the Freedom of Information Act , Public Records Acts and many other Federal and State Laws.
However, if you read misleading, defamatory, or degrading content, please notify us by email with as much detail as possible. We will not respond to theatening emails, or insults. Please write us a polite email, and you're more likely to get a positive response from us. Thank you for your help.

Jana Carpenter-koklich Went Missing In Lakewood California in August 2001

Facial/case ID
Public viewable

Missing

Last seen alive: August 20, 2001

Circumstances: The mising person was reported missing on 08-20-2001 by her husband after she failed to report to work. During the investgation, information arose that led investigators to believe the missing person was the victim of foul play. Eventually, the husband was arrested, tried and convicted of second degree murder in his wife's case. Her remains were never found.
First Name: Jana
Last Name: Carpenter-koklich

Details

Age When Last Known Alive: 41
Race: White
Ethnicity: Other
Sex: Female
Height: 67.0
Weight: 130.0

Location

City: Lakewood
State: California
Zip: 90712
County: Los Angeles

Appearance

Hair: Blond/Strawberry
Eye: Blue
Scars And Marks: a 1/2 inch scar on her forehead above her right eye

Clothing and Accessories

Transportation

Run a Free Background Check On Jana Carpenter-koklich

Recent Comments About This Profile

Montand: Regarding Trial � it was a no evidence case. Ray Peavy (police person) did not interview me and I was a lifelong friend. In court he /they didn�t even know who I was/am. Put someone in prison, without doing a real investigation. DA became a Judge because she was able to get Bruce in Jail �with no evidence�. Lots of fabrications in court -- first case �Bruce was broke and did it for the Money� , 2nd case �Bruce was rich and did it to keep all the Money� -- I am glad they knew he was so broke in first case ? The fact is they didn�t know much � except for the fact they wanted to get promoted.
09 23, 2014 | 04:48

Comment, or Post Updates

Post Your Comment: Warning: Inappropriate comments will not be published.
Your Name or Nickname
Your Email (will not be shown) 5 x 1 = ?

To find a missing person click on the first letter of his last name.
A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z -